Análisis de similitudes y diferencias de las condiciones editoriales establecidas en revistas indexadas de bases científicas como Scielo y Scopus.

Abstract

THe journals that are integrated in the Scopus and Scielo databases contain different requirements for publishing articles or scientific papers, this aspect is considered by the researchers to start developing or building the research, on the other hand, the research has been oriented through a qualitative analysis, where information was obtained from each scientific journal, reaching the conclusion that these have similar editorial conditions, but which in turn differ in the form of presentation, where reliable sources for knowledge have been taken as reference. of all the guidelines and in turn achieve the comparison of the journals, in addition, a confrontation was carried out between the publishers having in common a single purpose that is to present editing conditions, to create scientific production with reliable and quality information, offering the researcher a guaranteed and original work. Among the similarities that stands out is the presentation of the document, which in its majority must have the legend of the doc., the updated ORCID, names and surnames of the author, however one of the differences is when the annexes are not included in its structure.