DSpace logo

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://repositorio.utmachala.edu.ec/handle/48000/6599
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorSierra, Eduardo Alfonso-
dc.contributor.authorBasso, César-
dc.contributor.authorBeltrán Ayala, Efraín-
dc.contributor.authorMitchellFoster, Kendra-
dc.contributor.authorQuintero, Juliana-
dc.contributor.authorCortés, Sebastián-
dc.contributor.authorManrique Saide, Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorGuillermo Guillermo, May-
dc.contributor.authorCaprara, Andrea-
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho de Lima, Edilmar-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-02T13:36:45Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-02T13:36:45Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifierPathogens and Global Healthes_ES
dc.identifier.citationAlfonso Sierra, E. A. Basso, C. Beltrán Ayala, E. MitchellFoster, K. M. Quintero, J. Cortés, S. Manrique Saide, P Guillermo Guillermo, M. Caprara, A. y Carvalho de Lima, E. (2016) Innovative dengue vector control interventions in Latin America: what dothey cost?. Inglaterra. Pathogens and Global Health.es_ES
dc.identifier.otherAC 035-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.utmachala.edu.ec/handle/48000/6599-
dc.description.abstractBackground Five studies were conducted in Fortaleza (Brazil), Girardot (Colombia), Machala (Ecuador), Acapulco (Mexico), and Salto (Uruguay) to assess dengue vector control interventions tailored to the context. The studies involved the community explicitly in the implementation, and focused on the most productive breeding places for Aedes aegypti. This article reports the cost analysis of these interventions. Methods We conducted the costing from the perspective of the vector control program. We collected data on quantities and unit costs of the resources used to deliver the interventions. Comparable information was requested for the routine activities. Cost items were classified, analyzed descriptively, and aggregated to calculate total costs, costs per house reached, and incremental costs. Results Cost per house of the interventions were $18.89 (Fortaleza), $21.86 (Girardot), $30.61 (Machala), $39.47 (Acapulco), and $6.98 (Salto). Intervention components that focused mainly on changes to the established vector control programs seem affordable cost savings were identified in Salto (−21%) and the clean patio component in Machala (−12%). An incremental cost of 10% was estimated in Fortaleza. On the other hand, there were also completely new components that would require sizeable financial efforts (installing insecticide-treated nets in Girardot and Acapulco costs $16.97 and $24.96 per house, respectively). Conclusions. The interventions are promising, seem affordable and may improve the cost profile of the established vector control programs. The costs of the new components could be considerable, and should be assessed in relation to the benefits in reduced dengue burden.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherInglaterraes_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ec/es_ES
dc.subjectPATHOGENS AND GLOBAL HEALTHes_ES
dc.subjectDENGUEes_ES
dc.subjectMANEJO DE VECTORESes_ES
dc.subjectCONTROL DE VECTORESes_ES
dc.titleInnovative dengue vector control interventions in Latin America: what dothey cost?es_ES
dc.typearticlees_ES
Aparece en las colecciones: SCOPUS

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
nnovative dengue vector control interventions in Latin America what dothey cost.pdf132,34 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons