Principales errores en redacción científica en los exámenes complexivos de la carrera de contabilidad y auditoría de la UTMACH.

Abstract

Scientific writing comprises a set of criteria to prepare clear, precise and complete writings that synthesize new knowledge in an orderly manner when presented to society. The study seeks to determine the most frequent errors in academic writing in the Accounting and Auditing complexes of UTMACH through a comparative analysis. A descriptive methodology is applied, examining the writing and contents of the complex exams to identify errors and proceed to point them out and describe them. In the results, it is found that the most common errors are in pleonasm by redounding ideas, barbarism by misusing connectors/conjunctions between sentences and inappropriateness when using punctuation marks and, to a lesser degree, format and dequeism in the revised texts.